Both employer and union can violate their good faith bargaining obligations under the state collective bargaining laws when one party advances proposals prior to interest arbitration that are regressive from proposals made earlier in negotiations. In Spokane County (Spokane County Deputy Sheriff’s Association), PERC Examiner Stephen W. Irvin found, and the Commission affirmed, that the Spokane County Deputy Sheriff’s Association breached its good faith bargaining obligations by submitting a regressive wage proposal after impasse and shortly before the parties’ scheduled interest arbitration hearing.
The Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC) vacated an order dismissing the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 609’s unfair labor practice complaint against the Seattle School District. Seattle School District, Decision 11995-A (PECB, 2014). The union had alleged the School District had provided false and misleading information in response to its information request regarding placing an employee on administrative leave. The District must now file its answer to the complaint, and the matter can proceed to a full evidentiary hearing.
In Kiona Benton School District, the Public Employee Relations Commission affirmed Examiner Coss’s finding that the Kiona Benton Education Association, the Union that represents certain teachers in the School District, breached its good faith bargaining obligation under State collective bargaining laws by refusing to communicate with the District’s designated collective bargaining representatives.
An Employer may not unilaterally change disciplinary procedures without first notifying the Union and, if requested, bargain the change. In City of Seattle, Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC) Examiner Jessica Bradley found that Seattle City Light Department refused to bargain with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 77, in violation State collective bargaining laws by unilaterally implementing a second disciplinary process in conflict with the disciplinary procedure contained in the party’s collective bargaining agreement.
A Washington Court of Appeals recently sent a case involving Kitsap County’s decision to layoff two corrections officers back to the Trial Court for further consideration. In Kitsap County v. Kitsap County Correctional Officers’ Guild, Inc., the Appeals Court determined that the Trial Court erred when it failed to conduct the required Balancing Analysis to determine whether the County’s decision to layoff two corrections officers, based on an alleged jail budget shortfall, was a mandatory or permissive subject of bargaining.
In Seattle Community College, the American Federation of Teachers, Local 1789 alleged that the College committed a refusal to bargain violation when it unilaterally changed which online Learning Management System (LMS) it used without an opportunity to bargain the decision or the effects of the decision. PERC Examiner Casey King concluded that the decision to change the technology was not a mandatory subject of bargaining and that the College had sufficiently bargained the effects of its decision.
In Kittitas County Public Hospital District 1, PERC Examiner Page Garcia dismissed the Washington State Nurses Association’s complaint that Kittitas Valley Healthcare refused to bargain in violation of state labor law by making a unilateral change to the past practice of allowing the Association to post its materials at the hospital. Decision 11992 (PECB, 2014). Generally, union use of bulletin boards has been found to constitute a mandatory subject of bargaining, and in this case, the Examiner again determined that any change in how bulletin boards were used at the hospital would have to be bargained with the union. Ultimately, however, Examiner Garcia ruled that the Association failed to establish the existence of a past practice to post materials at all department break room bulletin boards, in addition to the single union designated bulletin board. As a result, the union could not carry its burden that a unilateral change violation had occurred.
A recent decision by PERC hearing examiner in Lake Washington School District and described in more detail in our recent blog article serves as an important reminder to pay close attention to all timelines. Although this decision arose in the context of an unfair labor practice complaint and PERC six-month statute of limitations, the same lesson applies in the processing of grievances under your labor contract.
In Lake Washington School District, Examiner Page A. Garcia dismissed the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 46’s skimming complaint as untimely under Chapter 41.56 RCW. The examiner concluded that the District provided “clear and unequivocal notice” to IBEW Local 46 in a letter to the union’s business representative, which falls outside of the six-month statute of limitations. Lake Washington School District, Decision 11913 (PECB, 2013).
In a recent decision, the Washington Court of Appeals reinforced the fundamental right state employees have in Washington “to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing” and not one unilaterally imposed by the employer. Division One Court of Appeals affirmed the Public Employee Relations Commission’s ruling that the University of Washington committed an unfair labor practice when it insisted on moving a group of hospital employees to a bargaining unit represented by a different union as a condition of reallocating them to a position with a higher pay grade.
