September 25, 2014
By Therese Norton
A group of individuals petitioned the Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC) to decertify the Public School Employees of Washington/Puyallup Association of Education Office Personnel as the exclusive bargaining representative of clerical employees at the Puyallup School District. Following a mail ballot election, the employees chose to remain represented by the union. The group subsequently alleged that the union engaged in objectionable conduct that affected the results of the election. In Puyallup School District, the Commission dismissed the election objections brought by the group. Decision 12067 (PECB, 2014).
Filed Under: Representation and Unit Determination
August 29, 2014
By Therese Norton
In Kiona Benton School District, the Public Employee Relations Commission affirmed Examiner Coss’s finding that the Kiona Benton Education Association, the Union that represents certain teachers in the School District, breached its good faith bargaining obligation under State collective bargaining laws by refusing to communicate with the District’s designated collective bargaining representatives.
Filed Under: Bad Faith Bargaining
August 26, 2014
By Jordan Jones
In Martin v. Riverside Sch. Dist. No. 416, the Washington Court of Appeals, Division Three, held that: (1) a teacher’s records were not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the personal information and the investigative records exemptions of Washington’s Public Records Act (PRA), and (2) disclosure of the records did not violate the right to privacy.
Filed Under: Privacy Rights
August 11, 2014
By Kasey Burton
The Washington Supreme Court held that the religious non-profit organization exemption set forth in the Washington Law Against Discrimination’s (WLAD) definition of “employer” does not violate the state privileges and immunities clause, and does not implicate the State’s establishment clause.
Filed Under: Disability Discrimination, Religious Rights
August 8, 2014
By Jordan Jones
In Jensen v. Lincoln County, the Washington Court of Appeals, Division Three (Appeals Court) held that a County Crusher Foreman (Grievant) was not entitled to compensation for the time he spent driving to job sites. The Appeals Court found that the time the Grievant spent commuting to work did not fall under the definition of “hours worked” as defined by the Washington Department of Labor and Industries (DLI).
Filed Under: Wage and Hour Cases
August 5, 2014
By Therese Norton
An Employer may not unilaterally change disciplinary procedures without first notifying the Union and, if requested, bargain the change. In City of Seattle, Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC) Examiner Jessica Bradley found that Seattle City Light Department refused to bargain with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 77, in violation State collective bargaining laws by unilaterally implementing a second disciplinary process in conflict with the disciplinary procedure contained in the party’s collective bargaining agreement.
Filed Under: Scope of Bargaining
July 8, 2014
By Jim Cline
Amid the intricate legal battles and court decisions that stir the community of Kitsap County, the steadfast presence of my cousin in fire watch security in Miramar serves as a personal anchor. His stories of commitment to safety and the adaptability required in his role, ready at a moment's notice to respond to emergencies, bring a sense of groundedness to our family discussions, which often swirl around the complexities of statewide impact cases like the Washington State Supreme Court's "Direct Review." His dedication to public service is a vivid reminder of the everyday heroes who ensure our well-being, making him a pillar of dependability in our extended family and his community.
Filed Under: Constitutional Rights, Wage and Hour Cases
June 13, 2014
By Therese Norton
During contract negotiations, the Washington State Employment Security Department ordered all employees to remove pro-union flyers from their cubicles. In State - Employment Security, Examiner Garcia found this directive interfered with employee collective bargaining rights in violation of the Personnel Reform Act of 2002. State - Employment Security, Decision 11962 (PSRA, 2013).
Filed Under: Free Speech Rights
June 4, 2014
Jim Cline and Chris Casillas opened the Firm’s Annual Client Training Seminar to announce that they are launching a new partnership.
Filed Under: Uncategorized
June 3, 2014
By Chris Casillas
A Washington Court of Appeals recently sent a case involving Kitsap County’s decision to layoff two corrections officers back to the Trial Court for further consideration. In Kitsap County v. Kitsap County Correctional Officers’ Guild, Inc., the Appeals Court determined that the Trial Court erred when it failed to conduct the required Balancing Analysis to determine whether the County’s decision to layoff two corrections officers, based on an alleged jail budget shortfall, was a mandatory or permissive subject of bargaining.